I am sure that when I have spare time, I will publish the definition of polar surface area.
Best,
Tian
]]>Probably this can take into account for the difference.
Regarding to the Polar surface area from MULTIWFN do you have more reference apart the manual, I ask you for the ongoing publication.
Thank you so much !!
Alessio Macorano
]]>Please note that there is no unique definition of molecular surface and its polar subregion. In main function 12, by default the isosurface of rho=0.001 a.u. is used to define vdW surface, in which the subregion with |ESP|>10 kcal/mol is regarded as polar part. This definition must be different to the so-called topological polar surface area in your screenshot.
Best regards,
Tian
]]>I would like to ask you one question about the topological surface analysis from .fchk of Gaussian or related QM software, the .fchk are generated from chk with b3lyp/6-311++g(d,p) with SMD implicit model solvent water.
On some drug like molecules i would like to use PSA (polar surface area) as molecular descriptors.
To do this i tried to calculate with multiwfn software from .fchk of Gaussian 16 software, but I obtain different values of PSA respect to Pubchem for example, and I don't understand why.
Maybe the difference is for the implicit model solvent ? should i have to consider in gas phase ?
Thank you so much for your work and this forum
Alessio