Yes, hole-electron analysis currently doesn't support EOM-CCSD.
Best,
Tian
]]>Thank you so much for the very useful information as I am unfamiliar with how a lot of these values are calculated currently. From what I gathered from the manual, I am assuming doing hole-electron analysis is currently not avaiable for CCSD in Multifwn? Thank you for so much of your help again. I greatly appreciate it!
Best,
Chase
This analysis has some correlations with hole-electron analysis. The charge density difference (△ρ) used in this analysis is formally identical to ρ(electron) - ρ(hole). The advantage of hole-electron analysis is that the cancellation between hole and electron is avoided, and thus the integral of hole or electron is exactly 1.0, which is fully physically meaningful (at least for single-electron excited state). In contrast, due to cancellation effect, the integral of absolute value of positive or negative of △ρ must more or less deviate from 1.0. Therefore, hole-electron analysis provides somewhat richer information about nature of the excitation.
Best,
Tian
]]>Thank you so much for your help! I will definitely look into your suggestions. With your first suggestion, I looked into the electron density difference and saw the output in the manual. The data is output as positive and negative components which makes sense. I was curious if this correlates to electron and hole analysis? If this does not, is it possible to do electron-hole analysis with EOM-CCSD? Thank you so much for your help again.
Best,
Chase
2 You should export cube file of hole and electron respectively. Then you can use VMD to simultaneously plot isosurfaces of the two cube files. Please check Section 4.A.14 of Multiwfn manual, I've provided a VMD script to very easily realize this.
]]>