Many many thanks for your kind attention to make me guide with your highly valuable comments.
Sincerely yours,
Saeed
SCS-MP2 has much better performance in calculating reaction energies, see its original paper. However, SCS-MP2 is evidently poorer than popular double-hybrid functionals, therefore currently SCS-MP2 is not useful.
SCS-MP2 has worse accuracy in studying weak interactions. In addition, it was found that accuracy of evaluating reaction barrier is somewhat deteriorated compared to MP2.
Best,
Tian
]]>Could you please let me know what is the advantage(s) of SCS-MP2 method with respect to the MP2 one? For instance, what is advantage of a SCS-MP2 wavefunction with respect to the MP2 wavafunction? Can we claim the SCS-MP2 geometry and energy is more accurate than the MP2 geometry and energy?
Finally, which of SCS-MP2 and MP2 takes into account the "electron correlation" and "dispersion effect" in a more accurate manner?
In advance, too many thanks for your kind attention and, valuable time and energy.
Sincerely yours,
Saeed