Sincerely yours,
Saeed
You should ask him. In my opinion, MP2 is out-of-date and never the preferential choice nowadays.
I am too busy to carefully look at the L608 problem...
Best,
Tian
]]>But, there is is challenging question in my mind! Professor Ibon Alkorta works on non-covalent interactions for years and he is quite expert in this field. In the almost all his study he employs only MP2 method in conjunction with a very large basis set such as aug-cc-pVTZ for geometry optimization purpose in the intermolecular XB- or HB-bonding mostly published in ASC journals! Could you please let me know, considering such very valuable advantages of DFT methods,why he always use MP2?
Yours sincerely,
Saeed
PS. I also asked you another question in "quantum chemistry forum" regarding energy decomposition using extralink 608. I would be highly grateful if you kindly answer this question as well.
]]>MP2 never performs so well as you stated. For example, it is well known that MP2 tends to strongly overestimate pi-pi stacking interaction.
B3LYP-D3(BJ) works well for geometry optimization for broad range of weaklying interacting systems. For example, the high-quality HB test set HB300SPX (J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 10, 6305–6316) employs B3LYP-D3(BJ) for geometry optimization, and J. Chem. Theory Comput., 11, 1481 (2015) showed that B3LYP-D3(BJ) performs nicely in optimization of many different kinds of dimers.
MP2 is much more expensive for geometry optimization and especially frequency analysis purposes, generally I do not recommend to use it. If an absolutely reliable and robust result is needed, I prefer to use double-hybrid functionals, such as revDSD-PBEP86-D3(BJ).
Best,
Tian
]]>In advance, too many thanks for your kind attention.
Sincerely,
Saeed