http://www.shanxitv.org/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=330 Wed, 13 May 2020 17:09:57 +0000 FluxBB http://www.shanxitv.org/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1105#p1105 Thank you for the clarifications.

]]> Wed, 13 May 2020 17:09:57 +0000 http://www.shanxitv.org/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1105#p1105 http://www.shanxitv.org/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1104#p1104 Calculation of Hirshfeld charge replies on density of atoms in their free states, different programs employ different atomic densities. In the CDFT analysis module of Multiwfn, built-in atomic densities are employed for calculating Hirshfeld charges, they were carefully generated at robust and accurate calculation level, see Appendix 3 of Multiwfn manual for detail. I don't know how the atomic densities in Gaussian were generated, this point is not documented in Gaussian manual. If you find the difference between Multiwfn and Gaussian is notable, the Hirshfeld charges given by Multiwfn should be more reasonable.

]]> Wed, 13 May 2020 09:20:09 +0000 http://www.shanxitv.org/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1104#p1104 http://www.shanxitv.org/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1103#p1103 Hi
I have calculated the Fukui functions of phenol which are in the examples and when I have compared the hirshfeld charges which are in the CDFT.txt file generated by Multiwfn with those calculated by Gaussian 09, I found that these values are not the same. Can I know why?

]]> Tue, 12 May 2020 20:28:33 +0000 http://www.shanxitv.org/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1103#p1103 久久精品国产99久久香蕉